Disclaimer: this is not my paper. I'm only posting this here because not enough people put their email address on their profile.
Hello my fellow Athenians,
The first of many proceedings shed light on some possibly immanent issues. First, I would like to know your views on the impoverished farmer's amendment of returning land to who it belonged to before the event that caused recent heated discussion. Are you for or against it? Either way, why?
Second, I would like to address possible issues. As it stands, I am unsure how I would vote on many issues, and I would like to have a full understanding of the matter. If land restoration is not going to be central to your discussion at the next proceeding, what are the top two you feel need to be addressed? I would also appreciate knowing why, therefore I could possibly see the reasoning behind your opinion.
Your Middling Farmer,
Tasha
I would truly appreciate your input. Please respond to tsa.k.hauchan@gmail.com
Hello my fellow Athenians,
The first of many proceedings shed light on some possibly immanent issues. First, I would like to know your views on the impoverished farmer's amendment of returning land to who it belonged to before the event that caused recent heated discussion. Are you for or against it? Either way, why?
Second, I would like to address possible issues. As it stands, I am unsure how I would vote on many issues, and I would like to have a full understanding of the matter. If land restoration is not going to be central to your discussion at the next proceeding, what are the top two you feel need to be addressed? I would also appreciate knowing why, therefore I could possibly see the reasoning behind your opinion.
Your Middling Farmer,
Tasha
I would truly appreciate your input. Please respond to tsa.k.hauchan@gmail.com
posted by Anonymous | 11:33 AM
1 Comments:
Having never had land to begin with, I have no opinion either way on the impoverished Farmer's proposal. It seems just to me that it should be returned to its original owners, as all stolen property should be returned to its original owner, but I have nothing to gain from it being restored. Perhaps it was rightfully seized, I do not know. If I had reason to believe that, I may vote later to discard that proposal.
Again, I have no opinion either way.
-Fishmonger, emhallen@uga.edu
Post a Comment
<< Home